Brazilian football · Historical results
Round 30: Bahia beat Mirassol; Flamengo and Palmeiras also win
Portuguese original published October 12, 2026 · Translation checked October 20, 2026; match and table data remain the October 12 snapshot · ConverteArq Editorial Team
A documentary roundup of three Sunday wins recorded by the Brazilian Football Confederation. It omits missing scores and does not describe unreported match action.
Sunday results in the official record
The Brazilian Football Confederation (CBF) 2026 Série A table, checked on October 12, records three wins on Sunday, October 11: Bahia 1–0 Mirassol, Flamengo 1–0 Fluminense, and Palmeiras 4–1 Corinthians. The listed kickoff times are 19:30 for Bahia–Mirassol and 17:30 for the other two matches. A search about Bahia and Mirassol prompted this roundup, which groups results from the same round.
In the standings displayed in that consultation, Flamengo had 64 points after 30 matches and Palmeiras had 63 after 30. These figures describe the record at the time and could change with later matches or updates. This is not a live table, and the snapshot does not establish who would become champion.
What a score can and cannot tell us
This roundup was prepared from documentary research. A result published by the competition organizer identifies the winner and goal difference; on its own, it does not show how either team played. We therefore make no claims about dominance, decisive performances or the intentions of players and coaches. We did not review video, match reports or interviews to describe incidents in these three games.
A question about one match and a question about a season require different records. For a fixture, readers need the teams, date and score; for a competition, they also need to know which table was consulted. Keeping those records together helps distinguish a Sunday result from a final position at the end of the year.
Keeping the consultation in context
When sharing this roundup, keep both the match date and the date of the table consultation. Without them, the message could circulate after later rounds and appear current. If the official table changes, a new check should be labeled as a different snapshot rather than replacing what this one recorded.
Hypothetical example: someone saves a Sunday table and another one from Tuesday. Before saying a single match explains every change, they should check whether other games or adjustments occurred in between. This is a reading method, not a claim that an adjustment happened in these results. The official link below lets readers check subsequent updates.
Sources and verification
Scores and points are a historical snapshot checked on October 12, 2026. CBF records change as the competition progresses; this page is not a live standings service.
ConverteArq commentary
Our view is that grouping confirmed scores is more useful than making a nearly identical page for each search variation. Bahia–Mirassol is included because that fixture appeared in the observed trend sample; the other results add context from the same documented round. Search interest is not used to explain why fans searched or to claim significance beyond the recorded facts.
There is also a limit to documentary reporting: knowing a score is not the same as having watched the match. Descriptions of performance would require separate reporting. We keep that limit visible and point readers to the organizer’s records. That preserves the distinction between a score update, commentary on the competition and a match report, without implying on-site coverage.